

AMD RADEON PRO WX 5100 SERIES
I was looking forward to the RX 5500 series Navi cards but seeing how they are power hogs in mobile applications (requires 8-pin and cited as 150W, 85W per notebookcheck ) and 150W in the desktop RX 5500 series I am doubtful it will bring much needed efficiency to their workstation lineup. AMD Graphics Card Comparison Guide: Radeon RX 480, WX 4100,WX 5100 and WX 7100 and Radeon Pro SSG.

PTC Creo performance out of the box slower than older Quadro P2000 by ~30%ģdsmax/Maya are DirectX and tend to perform best on Geforce GPUs (see most recent test ) Siemens NX performance out of the box slower than older Quadro P2000 WX 5100 out of the box performance is trailing RX 590 in Solidworks which suggests not enough optimizations despite the Polaris chip being old (2016) techĬATIA performance out of the box slower than gaming GTX 1660 Ti and older Quadro P2000 WX 5100 : = 160.0 GB/s due to memory clocks lowered, ~3.9TFLOPs FP32 compute at 1086 Boost clock Spec: = 200.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, 3.8 TFLOPs FP32 compute (at 1493MHz boost, in actuality it boosts to around 1700MHz) The memory bandwidth is offset by the higher memclock and use of GDDR5X on the P2200. Unless you're buying used off-lease ones for $250 or something close to RX 570 / RX 580 prices, the only major advantages over a ~$350-430 Quadro 2000 level Pascal/Turing series GPU are the Siemens NX performance, massively improved idle fan speeds (min fan speed 20% of 5000 is 1000RPM, "med" 40% is 2000RPM which is in line with Quadros' typical RPM), and 8GB VRAM.
